Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Tomas Lanik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dedura-Palomero vs Lanik analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Tomas Lanik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dedura-Palomero 0 - 0 Lanik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dedura-Palomero has won 52.09% of points on their second serve, while Lanik has won 45.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dedura-Palomero, in recent form, has won 53.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lanik has won 50.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.94% and 31.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dedura-Palomero has saved 71.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lanik has saved 50.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dedura-Palomero has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 12/ 7), with Lanik winning 48.08% (W/L 25/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dedura-Palomero has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 12/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lanik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Dedura-Palomero has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 9/ 6), where as Lanik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 49.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dedura-Palomero has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.95 while Lanik has played against players with an average rank of 92.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dedura-Palomero has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lanik has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dedura-Palomero has converted 46.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lanik has converted 37.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
886
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (12-7)
Career Total W/L
54% (88-76)
71% (10-4)
YTD W/L
32% (6-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Tomas Lanik For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Dedura-Palomero VS Lanik
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Dedura-Palomero VS Lanik H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Diego Dedura-Palomero | Tomas Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (10/4) | 32% (6/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (21/10) | 33% (15/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (175/124) | 45% (197/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 51 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:33 | 1:49:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 160.71 | 133.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (682/897) | 56% (737/1314) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (444/682) | 63% (465/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (112/215) | 46% (265/577) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (43/93) | 38% (49/129) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (392/905) | 39% (512/1316) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (7/3) | 33% (6/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (9/13) | 32% (6/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 11% (1/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Diego Dedura-Palomero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Tom Gentzsch
83%
(
63 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Niklas Schell
82%
(
75 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
61 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Etienne Donnet
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
118)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
13
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
82%
(
84 of
103)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
49 of
84)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Lanik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Tomas Lanik
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Valentin Basel
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(2) 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Tomas Lanik
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
42%
(
34 of
81)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Valerio Perruzza
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Tomas Lanik
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Vukadin
Player
Tomas Lanik
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Dedura-Palomero Vs Lanik Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Dedura-Palomero are available here and Lanik photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Diego Dedura-Palomero
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
